Software Quality Assurance Practice Exam

Is it true or false that inspections and walkthroughs in software testing are an improvement over the older desk-checking process?

1. True

2. False

The correct answer is: True

Inspections and walkthroughs are indeed considered improvements over the older desk-checking process in software testing. The main advantage lies in the structured and collaborative nature of inspections and walkthroughs compared to the more solitary and informal desk-checking method. In inspections, a formal review is conducted in which a team examines the product systematically, focusing on defects, adherence to standards, and overall quality. This process encourages thoroughness and allows for multiple perspectives, which can unearth issues that a single person might miss. Furthermore, inspections often involve specific roles such as a moderator and author, leading to a more organized approach. Walkthroughs, which are less formal than inspections but still structured, engage team members in reviewing code or design documents. They allow for live discussions and immediate feedback, which can help clarify understanding and identify potential problems early in the development process. Contrastingly, desk-checking is usually a solitary activity where an individual reviews their own work, which can limit the breadth of the review and possibly overlook errors. In summary, inspections and walkthroughs enhance collaboration, focus, and systematic error detection, making them a more effective approach than traditional desk-checking.